@FinnFooted@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
3
edit-2
1Y

Society needs to codify these rules into law though otherwise bad actors break those rules. When a right wing activist supreme court removes these protections, people get hurt. But, a store like this isnt doing this to hurt people, it’s to make a statement that the far-rights own discrimination can backfire on them. It’s a form of protest and a statement, not true bigotry. Its like using the flying spaghetti monster tactic to push legislation to be more strict on religion. These people are trying ro show that regulation on business to prevent denying goods and services is important for everyone, not just minorities the the right hates.

I think I’m confused. I’m pretty sure the court case that the supreme Court just ruled on proved the opposite.

I think I’m confused. I’m pretty sure the court case that the supreme Court just ruled on proved the opposite.

Create a post

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

  • We ENCOURAGE posts about events that happened to you, or someone you know.

  • We ACCEPT (for now) reposts of good malicious compliance stories (from other platforms) which did not happen to you or someone you knew. Please use a [REPOST] tag in such situations.

  • We DO NOT ALLOW fiction, or posts that break site-wide rules.

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

  • 1 user online
  • 1 user / day
  • 34 users / week
  • 3 users / month
  • 47 users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 64 Posts
  • 432 Comments
  • Modlog