This isn’t really malicious compliance. This is the very foundation of the point made by the Supreme Court. You should be able to refuse service to anyone for any reason. Anything less than that is the government engaging in violence to force you to work.

@zeppo@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
61Y

Not just any business. The decision was specfically about what they called ‘expressive activity’ such as graphic designers, artists, speechwriters, and movie directors.

@axtualdave@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
41Y

Just replace “Gay” with “Black” and see how awesome it sounds.

I don’t think it’s a smart decision. I think discriminating for any reason makes business sense nor will it win you any allies, but it should be legal. Anything less than that is the government forcing you to work.

Create a post

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

  • We ENCOURAGE posts about events that happened to you, or someone you know.

  • We ACCEPT (for now) reposts of good malicious compliance stories (from other platforms) which did not happen to you or someone you knew. Please use a [REPOST] tag in such situations.

  • We DO NOT ALLOW fiction, or posts that break site-wide rules.

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

  • 1 user online
  • 1 user / day
  • 34 users / week
  • 3 users / month
  • 47 users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 64 Posts
  • 432 Comments
  • Modlog