This has been a big problem in beauty products particularly, I know. People having sudden reactions to a cream they’ve used for years, because it’s actually a counterfeit.

You wouldn’t usually know where people are being silenced, since that’s kind of the point of silencing people. And if you’re in environments that celebrates sex workers, that’s your bubble, not the world.

People are going to draw so many dicks on that boi.

At a point where we ignore people who set themselves on fire in protest, it’s hard to argue that nonviolent protest by itself accomplishes much anymore, soo…🤷🏼‍♀️

My point remains. You’re advising people to leave social media voluntarily while not doing so yourself.

Yet you’re still here…

I absolutely would compare caffeine with heroin when making the point that the term “addiction” has become so broad as to be meaningless.

GIGO

I prefer PI, or pseudointelligence, as in The Diamond Age.

“Addictive” means so many different things to different people at this point, it’s become useless. If you can compare the erotic materials I share with my spouse to heroin with a straight face, I’m not the one with a problem.

No. I won’t see the message, because I don’t live in a state that tries to shame adults for their sexuality. If you’re going to insist on having the last word, maybe try being right first, next time?

Nah, I’ll just keep living in a place where we don’t make regulations to try to shame adults for having a sexuality, thanks.

CAs warnings are designed to force producers to make a version of their products that’s less likely to kill people available (and required in CA). That’s helpful to everyone.

The intention of this sort of warning label isn’t to make porn better, it is to build toward banning porn entirely. California isn’t trying to ban industrial production, so of course people are going to respond differently.

Can we stop associating power overreach with female authority figures, please?