I’ve been paying $5pm for family premium for years.

It couldn’t last forever, I guess.

I think it’s more likely the result of working through 200 prompts in five different chats using 5000-word templates and uploading hundreds of pages of pleadings.

Gpt-4 helped me prepare my client for cross examination last week.

It predicted ten key questions he would likely be asked, and specified what he should say and what he mustn’t say, based on the way courts have decided cases historically in similar contractual disputes.

All of those questions came up. So yeah, GPT-4 is still smart.

Exactly. It doesn’t do your job, it helps you do your job better. But apparently that’s a bad thing?

I’m five times better at my job thanks to AI. My life is better. I’m happier. I’m earning more.

So, yeah, fuck these articles. They’re clearly written by people who don’t understand it for people who can’t use it. “John replaced walking with driving a car and then he ran over a dog. Therefore cars are useless, overhyped, and bad.”

That said, the less competitors that use it, the better for me.

Someone gonna tell them what smartphones can do?

Is that a Roman numeral joke?

Nonsense. Less people are using it because there are viable alternatives and the broader novelty has worn off.

I use it every day in my job and the quality of answers only drops off when prompts are poorly crafted.

By and large, the average user doesn’t understand the fundamentals of prompt engineering.

The suggestion that “answers are increasingly dumber” is embarrassing.