Judge denies HP's request to dismiss printer lockdown suiit
www.theregister.comAiO devices won't scan or fax without ink, and plaintiffs say IT giant illegally withheld that info from buyers
You must log in or register to comment.
!technology@lemmy.worldYou are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
- 1 user online
- 191 users / day
- 586 users / week
- 1.37K users / month
- 4.49K users / 6 months
- 1 subscriber
- 7.41K Posts
- 84.7K Comments
- Modlog
- mods:
Please let the judge be an HP printer owner! If so, he’ll completely understand this bullshit.
That’s interesting, in a case like this the chances of the judge owning an HP printer are pretty high.
Would they still be allowed to rule on the case?
With something ubiquitous I don’t think there is a choice.
Think of if the case involved the iPhone or Android. You literally couldn’t find someone that didn’t own at least one of those.