The contract is worth up to $843 million, not including launch costs.

NASA has selected SpaceX to develop a vehicle that will bring the International Space Station to a fiery end when the time comes.

The space agency first asked U.S. aerospace companies for proposals in March 2023 and then again in September of that year. The request was for a “space tug” vehicle that could help deorbit the U.S. sections of the International Space Station (ISS) safely.

On Wednesday (June 26), the agency issued a statement announcing that SpaceX has been selected to develop and deliver the “U.S. Deorbit Vehicle” as it’s known. The contract is worth up to $843 million; that total does not include any launch costs, however, and is for the vehicle development only. The vehicle will be responsible for disposing of the space station “in a controlled manner after the end of its operational life in 2030,” the statement adds.

@wabafee@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
-1
edit-2
4M

Should have went with Boeing they seem to good at diorbiting stuff.

Technically it’s just a bunch of metal and other stuff but the thought of deorbiting the ISS makes me sad.

@Grimy@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
6
edit-2
4M

I wish they could send it into space so it can orbit the sun forever instead of burning up.

Optional
link
fedilink
English
44M

Good point, if they’re sending a rocket up there anyway, why not just push it away from earth rather than towards it? Is it because it’s in LEO and there’s a ton of other satellites farther out?

@Monstera@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
114M

Way too much dV to leave earth

@fubarx@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
04M

They leave the Boeing and Soyuz up there, then when it’s time, gas 'em up and have them act as controlled thrusters. Everything burns up in the atmosphere. All problems solved.

Saves them $800M and change.

RubberDuck
link
fedilink
English
14M

Yeah simple. It’s not like it’s rocket science.

@MrNesser@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
44M

Question: why deorbit vs push out of orbit away from earth?

@IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
creator
link
fedilink
English
204M

If they were going for uncontrolled crashes they would have selected Boeing

@over_clox@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
124M

They got a Boeing stuck to it right now. The mission may start earlier than planned…

Kokesh
link
fedilink
English
14M

Or the Soyuz and it’s thruster fits from last year.

@Etterra@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
04M

I can’t wait for the headline about his SpaceX miscalculated, rammed the station, and initiated a Kessler cascade, obliterating the infrastructure needed for international logistics and communications. Get ready for the sequel to the 1970s everybody!

@Tronn4@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
44M

Cause musk knows how build things that crash and burn

Create a post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


  • 1 user online
  • 186 users / day
  • 583 users / week
  • 1.37K users / month
  • 4.49K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 7.41K Posts
  • 84.7K Comments
  • Modlog