All these (ad)ons always take priority over performance.

@kadu@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
-7
edit-2
6M

deleted by creator

BNJMNBanks
creator
link
fedilink
English
11Y

deleted by creator

I want out but no one in my group chats will leave. 😭

At the company’s global Conversations event in Mumbai, WhatsApp introduced an in-app shopping feature for merchants and customers. Dubbed ”Flows,” […]

That name sounds more like a feminine hygiene product than a shopping platform.

Synapse
link
fedilink
English
231Y

Great, I can’t wait for Whatsapp to be the only way to reach customer support and make payments. I always felt the confused look of people when I tell them I don’t have Whatsapp wasn’t enough.

Today, on “Features No One Asked For”.

Neptune
link
fedilink
English
301Y

WhatsApp is a shithole. Communities, Channels, Payments, Avatars all these destroyed the simple chat app. Meta is aiming for a monopoly here.

Signal and Telegram pretty much useless if you don’t have your needful people on the platform.

@lattenwald@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
41Y

Thankfully I don’t have people I need on WhatsApp, but it took some convincing.

Nowadays I only have dentist and barbershop on WhatsApp, all my folks are on Telegram, including all work communications.

WhatsApp was always lacking features; WhatsApp web can’t replace a full featured desktop client which is a must have for me; and its mobile client is inconvenient in every possible way.

LUHG
link
fedilink
English
31Y

WA does have a desktop client. Fuck that though.

It’s just not a battle I am willing to fight. Too many people I can’t contact without Whatsapp and none of them willing to swap.

Meta adding the same features to all their apps, for whatever reason

The software enshittification cycle continues.

This is kind of funny. Some of these features I would see see as Google’s turf. However, since Google can’t create a text messaging service, Meta can use their messaging app to encroach.

@avater@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
01Y

removed by mod

@relyn@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
1041Y

Am I the only one who doesn’t want any, “do everything,” apps? I’d rather have 10 apps that each do one thing really well than have one app that haphazardly attempts to do 10 things.

It sounds to me like they’re trying to go like Wechat did

Make each program do one thing well. To do a new job, build afresh rather than complicate old programs by adding new “features”.

Unix philosophy. 50 years old idea. Imo devs would love to work that way but they are never the ones making decisions. And every CEO wants to have the new everything app ala wechat.

Flying Squid
link
fedilink
English
21Y

If I want to shop for something online, I’ll go to a website like Amazon.

If I want to transfer money online, I’ll go to a website like PayPal.

I don’t like the monopolizing those companies are doing, but they’re at least more transparent than doing it through a chat app. Can you even do returns for chat app purchases? I did a return with Amazon the other day and they just credited my account. They didn’t even ask for the book (I accidentally bought 2 copies) back.

Create a post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


  • 1 user online
  • 191 users / day
  • 586 users / week
  • 1.37K users / month
  • 4.49K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 7.41K Posts
  • 84.7K Comments
  • Modlog