No. another type of ML algorithm could, but not an LLM. They do not work like that.

The truth is, this is the perfect type of a comment that makes an LLM hallucinate. Sounds right, very confident, but completely full of bullshit. You can’t just throw money on every problem and get it solved fast. This is an inheret flaw that can only be solved by something else than a LLM and prompt voodoo.

They will always spout nonsense. No way around it, for now. A probabilistic neural network has zero, will always have zero, and cannot have anything but zero concept of fact - only stastisically probable result for a given prompt.

It’s a politician.

.

Spotify isn’t the only service currently.

Like I said in my op: it’s good service for the consumer. It might not be if enshittification ensues.

But compared to video streaming, it’s awesome.

The issue isn’t the service model, but the capitalistic shit behind it, that attempts to maximize profits instead of paying artists fairly.

I was referring to the sharding that happened with video streaming services. It used to be Netflix had mostly everything, in the start, similar to Spotify. Now there are services per publisher that contain their own catalogues.

Fuck. That.

I’m not familiar with the free tier, but if you don’t pay anything, I think ads are fine.

Paying and seeing ads is wrong on the other hand.

You’d be correct

Not sure what the relevance of this comment was, considering what I said

Not sure about the ads? If you mean when the app notifies you about live gigs etc. then yeah, that’s shittification. Luckily it doesn’t happen on my desk or car, but I wish it didn’t sometimes appear on my phone. That’s the one thing that might push me to add music to my video streaming arr stack.

I mean, Spotify is a great service for the consumer. One reasonable monthly fee for most of the music in the world.

If a similar video streaming service existed for 40€/month, I’d pay for it in a heartbeat. Now I have a plethora of arr apps and a vpn, and Plex. But it’s a hassle sometimes.

We’re all aware of the issues it created for the artists, and I’d be willing to double the fee if that money directly went to the artists, but this is where the capitalist model fails, as that won’t maximize the profits for shareholders.

If we ever come up with a way to fix the underlying greed models that come with publicly traded companies, that would be great.

As it stands, it is what it is, but I’m glad we have this, instead of a “different Spotify per music publisher”.

I guess I’ll go the GDPR route in this case

So what’s the best way to scrub your reddit comments and posts?

Could you elaborate as to why you feel that a mainstream platform should exist which doesn’t care if the content uploaded to it is stolen?

I get DMCA trolling, and that fucking sucks, but copyrights are important for the artists and creators trying to make a living from making content.

I am personally unaware of any serious reason to believe that Firefox’s numbers will improve soon.

Yeah about that. Manifest V3 will infuse Firefox userbase nicely come next summer.

Take note US. This is how we handle shitty practices in scandinavia.

Imagine if someone tried to implement tipping culture here.

One of the most important things when buying a used EV is checking the base of the car for any punctures. One could happen due a plethora of reasons.

Combine a puncture with driving in heavy rain/puddles and water damage may occur.

I hate Musk and wouldn’t buy Tesla ever, but this isn’t necessarily just because of the shoddy quality control they have.

Grayjay. I’ll just say that much. If you know Revanced, this will be up your alley.

The way the block works is that NSFW content works as it used to, but subs tagged by admins as porn will not.