Employees said they were eager to share the HR representative's response with their relatives.
Google employees typically work more than eight hours a day: Internal memo::Employees said they were eager to share the HR representative’s response with their relatives.
But should it be true? Why should businesses people work for expect or require them to use more than the minimum amount of time required for a full-time job, which should be lower anyway?
As an almost FAANG sized company engineer, I stay because I have work to do.
They ask me: Hey RedditWanderer, how much money /people and how long will it take to do this? I’m free to say whatever number, but I need to hit it. And when I don’t, I often feel personally responsible that I wasn’t able to foresee delays. They pay me a lot to get it right so I work a lot to look like I’m right.
On top of that the studio is like a 4 star hotel. Running late and would like to finish this one thing? That’s cool they’ll cook me food and pay my cab home. Got this project right? Here’s $80,000 worth of stock as bonus. Don’t feel like working today? Then just don’t come to work. It’s all about the social contract that they’ll let me do whatever I want because they’ll know I’ll do as much as I can.
I’m not saying it’s the proper way to do anything, and I definitely don’t expect my teams to stay late. Ideally I do my job well and nobody (aside maybe for me) needs to feel like they should work later.
It’s definitely not the proper way to do anything if you have a family. You should not have to choose between being a present parent and being paid what you’re worth. But a lot of companies, Google included, take a dim view of people who refuse to work as many hours as they can.
I get to choose though. I have unlimited time off/sick days, roll into work at whatever hour I want and can take time that I need to do other things. Nobody is forcing me to stay, and I had the opportunity to tell them how long it would take. I am also free to call it off and extend if I need.
I work a lot, but the company isn’t enforcing bad work life balance. Imagine if you had a job where your boss paid you hundreds of hours of overtime beforehand, and left it to you to decide when and if to take it, would you not sometimes do overtime when you feel it’s your responsibility?
You may get to choose. All those people whose bosses tell them they’re needed to come in on the weekend again do not. It’s not legal to enforce overtime, but it’s done in practice all the time.
Yeah thats definitely not ok, but in recent years I find work life balance, or at least the facade, has been a bigger part of company pillars. It’s really taboo to ask someone to stay past 4pm no matter what time they started. Nobody on any of my teams, and none of the teams I’ve ever been on have had mandatory overtime (that’s illegal in Canada for the most part unless they’re paying double bubble). Given we are salaried they can’t pay us overtime, so they pay us “ahead of time”.
I think you’re right, the pursuit of profit should not go against how we live as a society, but a lot of these FAANG workers are really cushy. I guess what I’m trying to say is I feel bad for the factory worker who is at risk of losing his job if he doesn’t do OT because he is short staffed and they are threatening to move the factory. I don’t feel bad for well paid engineers who decide to stay.
I would caveat your comment about FAANG workers being cushy. The majority of their workforce these days are contracted versus permanently hired on with the company proper. Those contractors/subcontractors get treated like disposable shit.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
English
But should it be true? Why should businesses people work for expect or require them to use more than the minimum amount of time required for a full-time job, which should be lower anyway?
But he said they get paid more. That makes it ok for some reason.
As an almost FAANG sized company engineer, I stay because I have work to do.
They ask me: Hey RedditWanderer, how much money /people and how long will it take to do this? I’m free to say whatever number, but I need to hit it. And when I don’t, I often feel personally responsible that I wasn’t able to foresee delays. They pay me a lot to get it right so I work a lot to look like I’m right.
On top of that the studio is like a 4 star hotel. Running late and would like to finish this one thing? That’s cool they’ll cook me food and pay my cab home. Got this project right? Here’s $80,000 worth of stock as bonus. Don’t feel like working today? Then just don’t come to work. It’s all about the social contract that they’ll let me do whatever I want because they’ll know I’ll do as much as I can.
I’m not saying it’s the proper way to do anything, and I definitely don’t expect my teams to stay late. Ideally I do my job well and nobody (aside maybe for me) needs to feel like they should work later.
It’s definitely not the proper way to do anything if you have a family. You should not have to choose between being a present parent and being paid what you’re worth. But a lot of companies, Google included, take a dim view of people who refuse to work as many hours as they can.
I get to choose though. I have unlimited time off/sick days, roll into work at whatever hour I want and can take time that I need to do other things. Nobody is forcing me to stay, and I had the opportunity to tell them how long it would take. I am also free to call it off and extend if I need.
I work a lot, but the company isn’t enforcing bad work life balance. Imagine if you had a job where your boss paid you hundreds of hours of overtime beforehand, and left it to you to decide when and if to take it, would you not sometimes do overtime when you feel it’s your responsibility?
You may get to choose. All those people whose bosses tell them they’re needed to come in on the weekend again do not. It’s not legal to enforce overtime, but it’s done in practice all the time.
Yeah thats definitely not ok, but in recent years I find work life balance, or at least the facade, has been a bigger part of company pillars. It’s really taboo to ask someone to stay past 4pm no matter what time they started. Nobody on any of my teams, and none of the teams I’ve ever been on have had mandatory overtime (that’s illegal in Canada for the most part unless they’re paying double bubble). Given we are salaried they can’t pay us overtime, so they pay us “ahead of time”.
I think you’re right, the pursuit of profit should not go against how we live as a society, but a lot of these FAANG workers are really cushy. I guess what I’m trying to say is I feel bad for the factory worker who is at risk of losing his job if he doesn’t do OT because he is short staffed and they are threatening to move the factory. I don’t feel bad for well paid engineers who decide to stay.
I would caveat your comment about FAANG workers being cushy. The majority of their workforce these days are contracted versus permanently hired on with the company proper. Those contractors/subcontractors get treated like disposable shit.