Roku looks to be seriously tightening its pursestrings. The company’s laying off a full ten percent of its workforce, over 300 employees, in addition to a conducting a number of other cost-cutting measures, as reported by Variety. These job cuts are just the beginning, as Roku’s also removing streaming content, consolidating office space and reducing outside service expenses. The goal here is a major reduction in the year-over-year operating expense growth rate.

@ansiz@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
61Y

I take this as a good sign that the data tracking market is growing stale. Like what value can tracking my viewing habits provide anyone, other than Roku, that the streaming platforms aren’t already doing on their own? It’s straight double dipping.

Hellfire103
link
fedilink
English
31Y

DVDs, people. DVDs and Blu-Rays.

terwn43lp
link
fedilink
English
11Y

shit i have to finish outer limits before they remove it

Yar matey! Sailin’ the Seas always be an option for ye!

@eeltech@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
181Y

They took a gamble and tried to play the streaming game - and lost

Did any of y’all Roku owners buy their device for the purpose of their streaming content? I know I didn’t - I bought it because of the promise of an excellent UI to organize all of my other already-existing-and-too-many services in an easy streamlined interface even my dad could use.

varoth
link
fedilink
English
891Y

I know an even better way for them to save money. Anthony Wood, the CEO, gets like $20,990,000 in total yearly compensation. Like most these fucks most of it is non-salary, so they don’t pay taxes on it right away if at all.

If you slice his compensation in half, that’s about 100 employees he can pay at $100k for a full year.

So employees cost more than just their salaries (if they get things like benefits, 401K match, etc.) So you’d have to cut more than half of his total compensation, which I don’t think either of us would be mad about

@HeyJoe@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
41Y

I also doubt most of those employees made 100k either so it’s probably still a good estimate.

@Xartle@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
581Y

I fell down the internet rabbit hole. He gets 1.2M in pay. No bonus and no stock award. The rest are options. Last year he has sold 400,000 shares worth $69M. The year before he sold 1,950,000 shares worth $690M… Looks like he had a scheduled sale of 80,000 shares every 2 weeks. Which had been worth about $25M every time. It looks like he stopped it when the same sale started pulling in about $11M. So yeah, assuming a generous $500k fully loaded employee cost, they cut $150M in HC. So canning him would save about 40 jobs. And he’d still be a billionaire.

@Shadywack@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
301Y

I think you touch on the real issue, and it’s where the wealth of a company is created. The cashflow and operations is one thing, the investor money is entirely another. People in the company don’t benefit from the investor capital nearly as much as the senior leadership does. The takeaway is how fundamentally broken the economy is right now as investment is wrecking how we do business. “Publicly traded” my ass. I get that companies need capital, and the VC money is one thing, but when we see shit like this it paints the picture of an established company getting enshittified to satisfy late game investors that act more like a parasite than anything else, and undermines the prosperity of business itself.

Like those slimy venture capital groups that take over declining businesses and instead of getting them back on their feet take out tons of loans against them, pocket the cash, then sell off the parts that still work and throw the rest (and the employees) away?

It’s not late game investors, but short term investors.

I mean I guess it’s both, but short term investors don’t give a fuck about the fundamentals of a company, they care about growth, or at least the illusion of growth above all else.

So you end up with gigantic conglomerates that do everything. Piano makers that sell dirt bikes, movie companies that run theme parks, kettle makers that run the largest financial institutions in the world. It makes no logical sense, but that doesn’t matter…. Line goes up.

@Xartle@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
61Y

Absolutely. Roku probably would be doing fine if they stuck with the cute little TV boxes and didn’t have to keep making growth targets for the parasites. That drive for constant growth has made their core product suck more too…

@Shadywack@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
31Y

Having used Roku stuff recently, and helping family out with their new shiny Roku tv’s, I couldn’t agree more. You took the words right from me. They enshittified bigtime since the days people genuinely loved using their products.

@dezmd@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
11Y

Roku tv interfaces are still better than vizio and even samsungs slower advertising interfaces.

varoth
link
fedilink
English
41Y

But we can’t have that I guess. I fucking hate corporations so much.

@SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
1
edit-2
1Y

You hear this a lot when personal wealth is discussed, “But his wealth isn’t real, it is in the business!” This shows that the wealth is real.

It amuses me when a company will go on about how they need to let people go and cut costs but then they piss away millions on a handful of people. The real issue is that they need to cut costs to keep pissing away money on a few people.

Wow. That is insane. You better be god’s gift to business brilliance to justify that.

@AbidanYre@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
141Y

removes streaming content

What else do they do/have?

@Reygle@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
121Y

I bought a Roku TV when I moved. Used it a few weeks and then realized the level of horrific tracking my pi-hole server was blocking from it. (thanks PiHole) I reset it to factory and no longer allowed it on the network. Now it’s an acceptable TV with a completely dogshit useless remote.

Sort of related- is it even possible to buy a “dumb” TV anymore or are we stuck paying 8x as much for “digital signage” panels now?

Spectre makes a dumb 4K TV. It’s a good panel that doesn’t track usage.

@Reygle@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
81Y

I shouldn’t be this excited about the link, but double-checked the specs on their official site and it’s not even equipped with ethernet/wifi- the world is so shitty these days that I almost squealed like a little girl. Thanks for sharing that.

Dudewitbow
link
fedilink
English
31Y

Why would it need ethernet/wifi if its a dumb tv?

@Reygle@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
71Y

It wouldn’t. That’s the feature I wanted to NOT see on it :D

@teruma@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
11Y

It’s a just ok panel. Tends to look really washed out.

I have a Roku TV.

I liked it at first because it’s just a vehicle for using Netflix, Hulu, or streaming from a HDMI.

But in the past 6 months, more and more ads keep showing. Things I’m refusing to interact with. Tried blocking and then they circumvented that.

Create a post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


  • 1 user online
  • 197 users / day
  • 590 users / week
  • 1.38K users / month
  • 4.49K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 7.41K Posts
  • 84.7K Comments
  • Modlog