The gold Apple Watch Edition was a completely different luxury watch flex.

Apple will no longer fix the $17,000 gold Apple Watch::The original Apple Watch models, including the $10,000-plus 18-karat gold Edition that Beyoncé wore, are now officially obsolete and won’t get parts, repair, or replacement services.

I wonder if Cash4Gold would take them. Lol I remember seeing this commercial as a kid.

@MeanEYE@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
5
edit-2
3M

deleted by creator

@conc@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
9
edit-2
1Y

I thought her fingers were her lips & chin

@weeeeum@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
581Y

The irony of building something so expensive, opulent and heirloom worthy around one of the most rapidly depreciating assets you can buy (technology)

@XTornado@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
-5
edit-2
1Y

I mean is at the end is a watch… at worst case the basic function will work. Although I admit that the battery is still a problem in this case. And that’s even if you look at the hour and isn’t just an accessory that you barely use it’s function.

@Zummy@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
11Y

I mean, Apple is currently supporting a 5 year old phone and it will probably be supported more years. Additionally, with last years iOS, they supported a 6 year old phone. So I don’t think support is an issue. In general, Apple supported the watch for several years. And the only thing they won’t don’t do is be able to repair it. However, since you want to talk about Google repair, let’s talk about how the Google Watch cannot be respired…by anyone. Literally if it breaks you throw it in the trash. So, maybe Google isn’t the best comparison.

If you bought a Rolex instead, it would have doubled in value in the meantime.

@paddirn@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
331Y

For +$17,000, that shit better have a lifetime guarantee on it, though I guess anyone with $17,000 to throw away on a watch probably doesn’t care anyways, they’ve probably forgotten that they own the thing anyways.

@madcaesar@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
141Y

Anyone who has 19,000$ to blow on a watch needs to be taxed a additional 18,000$

Even before they were unsupported, how have they not been “obsolete” for some time. Cannot imagine how slow a gen 1 watch would be. I can see the appeal of a timeless heirloom watch, but this is such a brain dead purchase.

@M500@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
761Y

Well, it’s not a brain dead purchase when $20k doesn’t even register for you.

Got $500,000,000 in the bank? Who cares?

You family has billions and you just have an unlimited alllowance. Who cares.

That’s who this is for.

With that being said, Apple did it for one year and I think it was just a marketing stunt. Everyone talked about it and now people know what an Apple Watch is.

It is for those with more money than sense, 100%. No matter how much money you have, it’s not going to solve the problem of it being incompatible with a newer iPhone. And that makes anyone who bought this a clown.

@erwan@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
51Y

The point is that for them, it doesn’t matter if the watch is obsolete and ends up in a drawer after a few years. They’ll just buy a new one.

For them 20k is like $20 for you.

That’s accurate I think but the departure point here is where Apple was making noises about delivering ‘premium jewellery’ or some such spiel.

Rolex, Omega, etc. all support their products for life and beyond. I’m still able to get my dads Speedmaster from the 60s serviced, heck my daily driver Seiko Pepsi from the 80s still has parts available.

Apple can easily afford this level of support which makes it kind of iffy that they don’t.

Flying Squid
link
fedilink
English
201Y

Honestly, good. Fuck the people who have this sort of money to throw away. They deserve it.

@heird@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
21Y

They’ve probably stopped using it years ago and got a new one

Weak attidude grounded in jealousy.

Flying Squid
link
fedilink
English
61Y

I’m not jealous of someone who throws away $17,000 on a useless toy. Maybe you think that’s impressive, but I don’t.

Apple is a brand perfectly positioned at the intersection of clueless but snobby.

@Zummy@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
31Y

So Apple will no longer fix the watch that came out 8 years ago? I mean, how long should they have fix products for? You buy a $17,000 dollar watch don’t be surprised if the company that no longer sells the watch and hasn’t sold it in 8 years, won’t fix it. There are legitimate things to criticize Apple for. This isn’t one of them.

@Candybar121@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
1
edit-2
1Y

deleted by creator

partial_accumen
link
fedilink
English
81Y

I had to look up that Apple Watch came out in 2015. I feel old…yet again.

The Covid years really did fuck with my perception of time. I feel like I should be three years younger

@illah@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
81Y

I still use the original sport band from 2015 on a 7th gen watch, and it fit the 4/5 gen before that. Unless the gold band was non removable from the watch I don’t see the issue.

Also the fact that this was never publicly available means these were gifts to celebs for PR, ain’t nobody losing any money on this.

@fishpen0@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
41Y

The body of the watch was also gold, not just the band.

Create a post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


  • 1 user online
  • 186 users / day
  • 583 users / week
  • 1.37K users / month
  • 4.49K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 7.41K Posts
  • 84.7K Comments
  • Modlog