Another major Chinese company risks Congress's banhammer.
Ghostalmedia
link
fedilink
English
324M

On one hand, the CCP fucking sucks. On the other hand, the US alternatives to some of these banned / tariffed Chinese products also really suck - especially when it comes to bang for your buck. ugh.

PopShark
link
fedilink
English
44M

For the love of fucking fuck please goddamnit I was just starting to enjoy flying mine fuck everyone in congress who voted for this fuck everyone and everything in general rn fr

SolidGrue
link
fedilink
English
124M

Software problems require software solutions.

//not affiliated, not endorsing

PopShark
link
fedilink
English
14M

Thank you friend. I like flying my drone to help me with a lot of anxiety and stress I have I fucking broke my arm eating shit on my bike I can’t do too much physical shit but flying drones I can do it has kept me sane I swear to God almighty I used to be a “fuck politics” blah blah person but I can’t take this anymore

😂

Freedumb!

Require licensing, registration, live gps tracking, and geofencing with a proprietary app because Freedumb people ruled that’s what the free market needs.

They then rule, nah. Actually just ban em all.

And now even if you bought them, buy them elsewhere, or just try to use them on a US device you won’t be able to. Selling them is illegal both from a company and on third party resale if it passes. Even police departments that are using them as spies and have the DJI alerting system installed all over town to track and log everybody in the sky, will need to get rid of it. But I doubt they will, of course it will be exempted for the pigs in blue.

If you can’t beat em, or even match their capabilities, ban em or implement 100%+ tarrifs. New American motto of the “free” market.

BarqsHasBite
link
fedilink
English
94M

Drone maker DJI is based in China and controls over 70% of the world’s drone market share, a combination that threatens U.S. lawmakers. As we first reported in April, 6% of DJI stock lies in the hands of Chinese state-owned businesses, which has led to fears of Chinese government backdoors, national security risks, and other fears of Chinese surveillance using the company’s drones.

Elise Stefanik, the Republican representative from New York who sponsors the anti-DJI legislation, said of the drones, “DJI presents an unacceptable national security risk, and it is past time that drones made by Communist China are removed from America.” Of course, this unacceptable risk h

@ssj2marx@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
4
edit-2
3M

deleted by creator

@Snapz@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
14M

I will say, had a chuckle when I saw these two posts in succession in your post feed

So to your own point, as long as there is at least one person with a credit card ready to go, probably no tipping point.

@ssj2marx@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
1
edit-2
3M

deleted by creator

@slickgoat@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
184M

*Land of the free!

Flying Squid
link
fedilink
English
34M

I have a really old one sitting in the closet. Am I going to have to get rid of it if this passes?

@Desistance@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
64M

No, this is only for new sales.

Flying Squid
link
fedilink
English
24M

Thanks.

@Maggoty@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
94M

If we had a real SCOTUS then both this and the TikTok ban would be dead on day one for clearly violating the prohibition on Bills of Attainder in the Constitution.

@Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
24M

Does that include dji clones? I have a look alike that has gps and full gymbal cam onboard but its aee not dji

@Fedizen@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
364M

Again like the tiktok ban: Rather than passing real privacy laws we’re passing racism laws and pretending this helps privacy and security.

Yeah, it’s real nice and all to say you want to combat chinese business interests threatening to swallow american ones whole, but then I can’t buy a house, and my rent is going up because these same business interests are buying houses in every major city by the thousands.

Then, they either renovate them, or let them sit vacant. The renovated ones get rented out at exorbant rates. And since they own such a significant number of these homes, the rents EVERYWHERE rise dramatically. And then you see all these vacant houses. Never rented. Never sold. They become drug havens for the cities homeless. But it doesn’t lower property values, because it’s all artificially high.

So now you’re paying higher city taxes, and living near a house that has regular gunshots out onto the streets. The cops won’t address it, because they know how dangerous those houses are. But you still have to rent an apartment near one.

But it’s ok guys. The government is banning tiktok, and drones.

@ripcord@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
5
edit-2
4M

“We can’t work on problem because something unrelated is worse and broken”, then? We can only talk about that when discussing any problem?

I’m viewing it more as “We have problem, and other related problem. We’re only going to do surface level solutions to be able to say at least we tried when elections come up”.

Those are all legitimate concerns, but I’m not sure the effort required to fix real estate prices, crime, and income equality is comparable to the amount of effort required to ban a social media site and some drones from a country that might not have our best interests in mind.

I’m trying to be optimistic about the ban, I’d love to see the drone industry take off in the us and I’d love to see what we could accomplish. It’s not a huge industry and I honestly can’t name a single US drone manufacturer, but I really hope that won’t be the case in a year or two.

@Maggoty@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
04M

Passing a law? Yeah it’s pretty much the same workload.

I don’t know about the other states/cities, but in my city it would be real simple. Just ban companies from buying real estate. Maybe an individual can own 6 houses. I’m not saying that people can’t own and rent out houses. I’m saying ban it so that company can’t buy entire neighborhoods, and then monopolize the prices.

@ripcord@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
14M

How would that work for, say, apartment complexes? Allow co-ops (which are typically corporations)?

I’m specifically talking about houses. Although you do raise a good point that companies shouldn’t be allowed to own out of market apartment buildings. Meaning if your company is based in Chicago (for example) you can only buy apartment buildings in your area. And there should probably also be a limit on what percentage of your market you should be allowed to own. But either way they couldn’t also own buildings in NYC, L.A, Miami, ect.

@NatakuNox@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
144M

I’m so glad they are focusing on the things we really need

U.S. government simply hates its citizens.

@AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
34
edit-2
4M

This is honestly ridiculous. The security concerns are unwarranted. Any surveillance that these drones could accomplish if hacked can just be bought off of any GIS website.

“But military bases” go fly a drone by one and see what happens. This already isn’t a surveillance concern.

This is going to set the hobbyist and professional drone market back a decade.

@slickgoat@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
154M

Only in the US. The rest of the world buys them. It still is a major market lose, but China still makes Huawei phones.

@AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
64M

Good point. Unfortunate that US consumers keep getting screwed by these bans

PopShark
link
fedilink
English
34M

I have a DJI drone and I agree. I would know if it’s collecting weird telemetry I have a DNS filter which would spot it all. It doesn’t. Just normal shit.

@AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
34M

I have pulled mine apart too. I have an old one from before the tracking law and I didn’t find anything nefarious. The one I have from after the tracking law went into effect is transmitting its location and ID but I didn’t find much else even on a network intercept.

Maybe there is some way to open a stream to China buried deep in the firmware, but I don’t see what use China would have for that. They have other methods of surveillance

PopShark
link
fedilink
English
24M

Sry for the late response but agreed!!

Create a post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


  • 1 user online
  • 182 users / day
  • 580 users / week
  • 1.37K users / month
  • 4.49K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 7.41K Posts
  • 84.7K Comments
  • Modlog