removed by mod
fedilink
@gornar@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
161Y

Sure is weird that Google wants to get rid of adblocking with its WEI spec for “security” purposes…while delivering malware via ads!

This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥
creator
link
fedilink
English
861Y

removed by mod

@rehabdoll@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
221Y

… and attempting to kill adblockers!

I’m nostalgic for the day when Google was the good company. A few years before “alphabet” you could see the change coming and since “alphabet” they are worse every year.

They never were the “good company,” in my opinion. We were just naive and ignorant of what they were up to.

And they were trying to maintain a false veneer. Nowadays it’s mask off with them.

Obinice
link
fedilink
English
211Y

Phew, good thing we block all ads, etc, then.

My PiHole lost is over 7.5 million domains, it’s a beast. I love the people that make that software!!

More isnt necessarily better though

@anyone_yun@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
11Y

Good thing I’m blocking ads!

Stories like this really make me wish there was a viable mobile OS not connected to Google or Apple either directly or by way of them being the ultimate maintainer so I could cut such things out if my life completely.

It just doesn’t sit right with me that Android is the only mobile OS that really allows me the most flexibility to avoid such things, yet it is ultimately controlled by Google.

iOS seems like getting around some of the arthritis problems in your left hand by amputating the hand out right.

And they wonder why we block ads

@Crisps@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
281Y

It’s about time the ad hosts, like google and Facebook, are found liable for all this nonsense in a class action.

@dan1101@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
51Y

Google wants even more than billions of dollars in ad revenue but can’t or won’t properly curate their ads. If you’re too big to control your content then you’re too big as a company. But I suspect they just don’t want to pay people to curate the ads.

@Zeth0s@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
51Y

Title incomplete, also via bing search ads

TipRing
link
fedilink
English
341Y

Advertisers should be held liable for malware delivered on their platforms. A big reason to block ads is to prevent these types of attacks.

Can we also extend this to ads for scams? Waaay too many people have fallen for scams from Facebook ads and the like.

@krayj@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
6
edit-2
1Y

To take it a step further, the end site that causes the ad to load should also be jointly liable. They are the entity that makes the partnership with the ad network, they are the one benefitting, and they are the one making ads a requirement to use their site. It’s the end site that pushes the requirement for the user to see ads to use their site, and so they should inherit some of the responsibility for ensuring those ads are not harmful.

if you force me to view ads to use your site, then you should be forced to vouche for the integrity of those ads.

Bappity
link
fedilink
English
151Y

boy am I glad to use Firefox and uBlock Origin 😁👍

Create a post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


  • 1 user online
  • 220 users / day
  • 609 users / week
  • 1.39K users / month
  • 4.49K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 7.41K Posts
  • 84.7K Comments
  • Modlog