Very true, but you have to be able to sell those assets to gain from them. If the stock market is erased you can’t sell your yacht to another exploiter because their networth is decimated too and they can no longer borrow off anything but physical assets, and now they also have a massive “income” stream that is now down so borrowing is more risky. We coulda had a bad bitch of a society, instead we let the rich turn us all into Mammon zombies.
Possibly just a modified Dreamcast
Here’s a shell replacement that is very similar to your dreamcast
This is what happens when trying to give equal platforming to buttcracks on top of shoulders. They shit all over everything and dont understand why the mic was taken from them. They dont understand why we can post about single payer healthcare and they can’t say immigrants deserve to die. They think all ideals are equal on the battlegrounds of legislature.
According to nathanaldensr on an ATT forum:
So much terrible advice in this thread, including by AT&T. I’m a software developer, including web development, of 20+ years who is used to seeing these kinds of things. Hopefully I can help educate the folks on this thread.
TL;DR: There is nothing wrong with your equipment or its settings. Your internet connection is down and your modem is hijacking outgoing HTTPS connections. Once your internet connection comes back, the modem will no longer perform this behavior.
In-depth answer:
Various apps like browsers and Zoom use a protocol known as HTTPS. This protocol requires that your client device (PC, phone, etc.) and the remote server negotiate a secure, encrypted connection. Part of this negotiation is the server presenting the app with a certificate. The certificate will be issued for the domain name your computer is trying to access. For example, when your internet connection is working, connecting a browser to https://att.com will result in the server presenting a certificate for att.com, which is both trusted by a so-called “trusted certificate authority” and is also issued for att.com. Because the certificate is trusted and its domain name matches the domain name you are attempting to connect to, the browser allows the connection.
Your problem arose because the AT&T modem, often a brand like Arris, detects that there is no internet connection and intercepts these outgoing HTTPS connection attempts. Instead of not responding at all, which I argue is the more secure option, the Arris modem responds with a so-called “self-signed” certificate–named this way because the certificate was not issued by a trusted certificate authority like the real https://att.com certificate. Not only is the certificate not trusted, but it’s also issued for the domain name dsldevice.domain_not_set.invalid, which, of course, doesn’t match the domain name your client device is attempting to connect to. This results in scary warnings, popups, etc. These warnings differ from app to app, but they almost always prevent any further activity on the connection. This is for security reasons because sometimes malicious actors can man-in-the-middle a connection attempt between your client device and a server and attempt to provide a fake certificate. Most modern apps are programmed to handle these mismatches and prevent you from continuing to use the connection.
For example, here is Zoom’s warning window that shows the self-signed certificate, its domain name (called a common name in certificate parlance), and who it was issued by. You can see the issuer is Arris, who is the manufacturer of my modem. Ignore the “The certificate is valid” with a green checkmark; the certificate is “valid” in the sense that it is well-formed, but it is invalid in the sense that it was not signed by a trusted certificate authority and is issued for a mismatched domain name (Zoom really should not report self-signed certificates as “valid.”)
Insightful, kinda a dick about it tho. But yeah some message interception from your router or provider seems to be it.
I dont have this experience myself. I just saw your post and browsed some forums. So be cautious. But the issue isn’t contained to any single device, platform, or provider it seems. So these explanations seem valid.
I’m gonna be real. I dont think home directory files should handled by something named tmpfiles. I think something named tmpfiles should only handled volatile data as it is colloquially known. I get there’s a lot that can be considered that in home directories. But user data should be handled by something that is made for that and users inherently know by the name that this will mess your home directory. This only applies to monoliths and monoliths to be like systemd. Maybe you’re doing too much with a single program if your naming becomes problematic.
I only emulate. Its way more convenient. Load my shit up into my network, and I always have it on a main drive or a backup. It just makes no financial sense to own the physical ones when I can download it for free and just use my existing equipment. Yeah, it got ruined hard and nobody could preserve it in a way for everyone to enjoy because someone’s taint will hurt if someone else posts 30 year old abandonware.