Comcast and other ISPs asked FCC to ditch listing-every-fee rule. FCC says "no."
FCC says “too bad” to ISPs complaining that listing every fee is too hard::Comcast and other ISPs asked FCC to ditch listing-every-fee rule. FCC says “no.”
The ISPs arguments are bogus, anyway. The claim they don’t know the costs when offering a contract, but suddenly remember each and everything when writing the bill…
How is there more than one? Unless you need something slightly unusual like a static IP. Otherwise, everything should be covered by type of subscription, cost of subscription.
It’s for businesses where it’s cheaper to pay the ISP to guarantee that it’ll stay the same than it is to pay someone to fix things that break if it does change.
That’s where most static IPs are sold, yes, but one does not guarantee the other. The business plan is more about getting priority over residential customers for repairs.
On the one hand I’m sceptical that a company couldn’t tell customers ahead of time what fees they might be paying.
On the other hand, I once worked for an ISP that deleted its customer database and all backups to save itself data warehousing fees and literally had no idea how much customers were paying or what services it was providing them. So it does happen.
On the other other hand (yes, I have three), incompetence shouldn’t shield you from the consequences of failing your responsibilities.
This is how government should work. A government FOR the people.
This is the kind of pro-consumer news that I’ve become accustomed to hearing only about the EU. I realize this doesn’t stop ISPs from simply levying fees and only demands that they list them, but seeing an itemized list of where your money goes is a first step in realizing that you might be getting screwed.
Broadband ISPs also had protected monopoly or duopoly status for a really long time. It’s been fucking hilarious watching the cable company freak out because T-Mobile 5G is a viable option in my area now.
We have government regulators in Australia. Surprise, surprise, fees aren’t lengthy, can be explained, and are investigated by the “Consumer Watchdog”—literally what the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission is called—if shit’s starting to look shady or unreasonable. We love capitalism, but we put a long socialism leash on it to reduce strain, deception, and fraud that makes victims of smaller businesses or individuals.
I love it. It makes a lot of shady ideas never leave the board room and if they do, chances are it ends up being really bad PR. All the while, playing the capitalism game well still nets high reward.
as long as it’s heavily regulated otherwise it turns the world into monopolistic hellscape.
I love it when super pro capitalists cite Adam Smith. His seminal book on capitalism clearly explains the logical hellscape outcomes that will naturally evolve over time but people gloss over that.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
English
Good. That was such a bullshit excuse. It’s literally outputting from a spreadsheet.
My work is making bills out of ISPs’ data. Every kb of mobile data and every call minute is tracked and rated.
The ISPs arguments are bogus, anyway. The claim they don’t know the costs when offering a contract, but suddenly remember each and everything when writing the bill…
Then, Mr ISP, you have too many fees or they are too complicated for you to charge.
I don’t see what’s so complicated. Where’s the burden of writing “because we fucking feel like it” on the bill?
I just hope they won’t intensionally traffic shape to load real slow, or have to click excessive buttons to list every items.
You just know that track all of those fees anyways to make sure they bill you for them. Not listing them is just malicious.
When I wear my glasses the Ben Franklin in the thumbnail is 3D, when I take them off he’s not anymore.
It’s called Chromostereopsis
That is so cool! Thanks for sharing!
Based.
Based.
If you can charge the fee you can tell me about. Sounds pretty simple.
removed by mod
They got away with murder from Trump for so long they got used to it.
And Ajit Pai.
deleted by creator
They’ll just make a fee for having to list their fees, and make the consumer pay for it.
It would be pretty bad for their reputation when its bad already.
But consequence? No. We can’t get onto the Internet without them.
Some decent news for a change at least
How is there more than one? Unless you need something slightly unusual like a static IP. Otherwise, everything should be covered by type of subscription, cost of subscription.
My IP hasn’t changed in the four years I’ve lived here… why is there even a fee for that when I’ve seemingly gotten it for free?
It’s for businesses where it’s cheaper to pay the ISP to guarantee that it’ll stay the same than it is to pay someone to fix things that break if it does change.
So… move to a business plan?
That’s where most static IPs are sold, yes, but one does not guarantee the other. The business plan is more about getting priority over residential customers for repairs.
Starting my DBA tomorrow! We here at Kait Co. require a static IP business plan!
On the one hand I’m sceptical that a company couldn’t tell customers ahead of time what fees they might be paying.
On the other hand, I once worked for an ISP that deleted its customer database and all backups to save itself data warehousing fees and literally had no idea how much customers were paying or what services it was providing them. So it does happen.
On the other other hand (yes, I have three), incompetence shouldn’t shield you from the consequences of failing your responsibilities.
Where are you getting all these hands?
Their ISP was located in Chernobyl.
Dad had one of those glow-in-the-dark wrist-watches with the radium dials.
This is how government should work. A government FOR the people.
This is the kind of pro-consumer news that I’ve become accustomed to hearing only about the EU. I realize this doesn’t stop ISPs from simply levying fees and only demands that they list them, but seeing an itemized list of where your money goes is a first step in realizing that you might be getting screwed.
Isn’t that bad dude still in charge of it
…Ajit Pai?
Broadband ISPs also had protected monopoly or duopoly status for a really long time. It’s been fucking hilarious watching the cable company freak out because T-Mobile 5G is a viable option in my area now.
We have government regulators in Australia. Surprise, surprise, fees aren’t lengthy, can be explained, and are investigated by the “Consumer Watchdog”—literally what the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission is called—if shit’s starting to look shady or unreasonable. We love capitalism, but we put a long socialism leash on it to reduce strain, deception, and fraud that makes victims of smaller businesses or individuals.
I love it. It makes a lot of shady ideas never leave the board room and if they do, chances are it ends up being really bad PR. All the while, playing the capitalism game well still nets high reward.
Capitalism is fantastic.*
I love it when super pro capitalists cite Adam Smith. His seminal book on capitalism clearly explains the logical hellscape outcomes that will naturally evolve over time but people gloss over that.