Fantastic! I love music and am currently training an AI of myself to determine whether or not I would like certain music, movies, tv shows, video games, business ideas, technolory, porn and art. In order to train my personal AI properly I need a copy of everything every human being and corporation has ever created so I can personally assess it.
You’re free to learn from any piece of music too. Whether AI is actually learning is still debatable but you have the same rights right now.
I’m still on the edge tbh I feel like it is learning and it is transformative but it’s just too powerful for our current copyright framework.
Either way, that’ll be such a headache for the transformative work clause of copyright for years to come. Also policing training would be completely unenforcable so any decision here would be rather moot in real world practice either way.
I should think everybody should get a piece [Edit] Inspired actually changes everything. Inspired is all you. But if you’re using actual parts or pieces of somebody else’s work, then they should be compensated.
Oh, so when a ai company wants to use copyrighted works without permission or compensation it’s “fair use” but when I do it, it’s “piracy” and “I need to leave before the cops are called”.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Fantastic! I love music and am currently training an AI of myself to determine whether or not I would like certain music, movies, tv shows, video games, business ideas, technolory, porn and art. In order to train my personal AI properly I need a copy of everything every human being and corporation has ever created so I can personally assess it.
This is great news for everyone!
Wait, not like that…
What do you think the internet was intended to be? People have been fighting for the free flow of information on the internet since darpanet.
We don’t respect copyright when it actually applies. Why do you think we’d respect it when it obviously doesn’t.
why are comments full of AI shilling? are these bot accounts or are there still real people actually defending “AI” ““art””?
A big % of social media comments are bots, more than you can imagine. You probably have had multiple arguments with Chat-GPT without knowing.
They’re not recreating music or selling albums. Someone called the musicians victims lol
Insane stuff
Even the one where I moist-farted the riff from “7 Nation Army” and looped it for 24 hours, i.e. 7-nation-army-beans-and-dairy-mix.aiff?
You already named it aiff (Artificial Intelligence Fart File)
I would like to hear this if it’s real.
I use it to study med. If anyone wants a fun way to memorise cancer treatments here you go. I find ai songs for study extremly useful.
https://suno.com/playlist/b0722434-83a3-45db-a874-9edff53013bc
I like suno because its fun to think of dumb shit to make a song over
If you created anything good or funny on suno, feel free to share it on !aimusic@sopuli.xyz
Imagine how many years of prison would get an individual if he admitted in court to pirate tens of millions of music files in order to make a profit
deleted by creator
Great AI gets more rights than us too!
You’re free to learn from any piece of music too. Whether AI is actually learning is still debatable but you have the same rights right now.
I’m still on the edge tbh I feel like it is learning and it is transformative but it’s just too powerful for our current copyright framework.
Either way, that’ll be such a headache for the transformative work clause of copyright for years to come. Also policing training would be completely unenforcable so any decision here would be rather moot in real world practice either way.
Lmao, fair use… Fuck off with that in this case
Say what you will, but “I Glued My Balls to My Butthole (Again)” fucking slaps.
I prefer ‘I Stink’.
Sadly I love that song. It resonates with my lived experience.
Just tried it out out of curiosity. It does a good job, but the music is still boring.
Well, Microsoft started this line of argument recently æ. Makes sense others also adopt it
All creators should be compensated if what they created is used to make money at the very least.
If I make a song inspired by the sound of two artists, the lyrics of two other songs, and the voice of a few more, who gets the money?
I should think everybody should get a piece[Edit] Inspired actually changes everything. Inspired is all you. But if you’re using actual parts or pieces of somebody else’s work, then they should be compensated.Oh, so when a ai company wants to use copyrighted works without permission or compensation it’s “fair use” but when I do it, it’s “piracy” and “I need to leave before the cops are called”.