Google’s AI Overview launch showcases that the race for AI domination is perilous.

‘I’m sorry, Google, I’m afraid, I cant do that!’

@atrielienz@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
35M

The onion articles? Or just all the other random shit they’ve shoveled into their latest and greatest LLM?

@Nobody@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
725M

Tech company creates best search engine —-> world domination —> becomes VC company in tech trench coat —-> destroy search engine to prop up bad investments in artificial intelligence advanced chatbots

@cm0002@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
75M

You either die a hero or live long enough to become the villain

@normalexit@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
25M

Stealing advanced chat bots, that’s a great way to describe it.

Then Hire cheap human intelligence to correct the AIs hallucinatory trash, trained from actual human generated content in the first place which the original intended audience did understand the nuanced context and meaning of in the first place. Wow more like theyve shovelled a bucket of horse manure on the pizza as well as the glue. Added value to the advertisers. AI my arse. I think calling these things language models is being generous. More like energy and data hungry vomitrons.

@WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
11
edit-2
5M

Calling these things Artificial Intelligence should be a crime. It’s false advertising! Intelligence requires critical thought. They possess zero critical thought. They’re stochastic parrots, whose only skill is mimicking human language, and they can only mimic convincingly when fed billions of examples.

It’s more of a Reddit Collective Intelligence (CI) than an AI.

Collective stupidity more like

@aesthelete@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
25M

It’s like they made a bot out of the subreddit confidently incorrect.

Okay Google… I’m about to go to sleep but I must know something before I go… If I could get the perfect penis to attract my perfect female counterpart, describe my penis, where my wife put it and how many pieces did she cut it to. Most importantly, will the scars make ribbed for her pleasure?

@jeffw@lemmy.world
creator
link
fedilink
English
95M

0_0

Go to sleep

@atrielienz@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
15M

I imagined him saying this to a Google home speaker. It was hilarious. I laughed.

@cmeu@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
55M

Just let an algorithm decide. What could go wrong?

Maxnmy's
link
fedilink
English
335M

Isn’t the model fundamentally flawed if it can’t appropriately present arbitrary results? It is operating at a scale where human workers cannot catch every concerning result before users see them.

The ethical thing to do would be to discontinue this failed experiment. The way it presents results is demonstrably unsafe. It will continue to present satire and shitposts as suggested actions.

Is Google not using a RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) system with their llms?

Correcting over a decade of Reddit shitposting in what, a few weeks? They’re pretty ambitious.

This is perhaps the most ironic thing about the whole reddit data scraping thing and Spez selling out the user data of reddit to LLM’S. Like. We spent so much time posting nonsense. And then a bunch of people became mods to course correct subreddits where that nonsense could be potentially fatal. And then they got rid of those mods because they protested. And now it’s bots on bots on bots posting nonsense. And they want their LLM’S trained on that nonsense because reasons.

@gedaliyah@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
105M

At this point, it seems like google is just a platform to message a google employee to go google it for you.

Is that employee named Jeeves?

@jas0n@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
25M

…Always had been

Does anybody remember “Cha-Cha?” This was literally their model. Person asks a question via text message (this was like 2008), college student Googles the answer, follows a link, copies and pastes the answer, college student gets paid like 20¢.

Source: I was one of those college students. I never even got paid enough to get a payout before they went under.

@iAvicenna@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
675M

“Many of the examples we’ve seen have been uncommon queries,”

Ah the good old “the problem is with the user not with our code” argument. The sign of a truly successful software maker.

@voluble@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
265M

“We don’t understand. Why aren’t people simply searching for Taylor Swift”

@ano_ba_to@sopuli.xyz
link
fedilink
English
385M

Now, instead of debugging the code, you have to debug the data. Sounds worse.

@Moreless@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
35M

After enough time and massaging the data, it could all work out - Google’s head of search aka Yahoo former search exec

@Bobmighty@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
75M

I once had a Christmas day post blow up and become top of the day from a stupid pic I uploaded. I wonder if some of those comments or a weird version of that pic will pop up. Anyone that had similar things happen should keep their eye out. Anything that blew up probably gets a bit more weight.

Oh God, cumbox! All of cumbox is in there. I wonder what kind of unrelated search could summon up that bit of fuzzy fun?

@trollbearpig@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
7
edit-2
5M

I looove how the people at Google are so dumb that they forgot that anything resembling real intelligence in ChatGPT is just cheap labor in Africa (Kenya if I remember correctly) picking good training data. So OpenAI, using an army of smart humans and lots of data built a computer program that sometimes looks smart hahaha.

But the dumbasses in Google really drank the cool aid hahaha. They really believed that LLMs are magically smart so they feed it reddit garbage unfiltered hahahaha. Just from a PR perspective it must be a nigthmare for them, I really can’t understand what they were thinking here hahaha, is so pathetically dumb. Just goes to show that money can’t buy intelligence I guess.

If you have to constantly manually intervene in what your automated solutions are doing, then it is probably not doing a very good job and it might be a good idea to go back to the drawing board.

Here’s an idea google, why not set it back like it was 10-15 years ago

The problem is, the internet has adapted to the Google of a year ago, which means that setting Google search back to 2009 just means that every “SEO hacker” gets to have a field day to get spam to the top of results without any controls to prevent them.

Google built a search engine optimized for the early internet. Bad actors adapted, to siphon money out of Google traffic. Google adapted to stop them. Bad actors adapted. So began a cat-and-mouse game which ended with the pre-AI Google search we all know and hate today. Through their success, Google has destroyed the internet that was; and all that’s left is whatever this is. No matter what happens next, Google search is toast.

@Aceticon@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
3
edit-2
5M

It’s even broader than that: historically most of the original protocols for the Internet were designed assuming people wouldn’t do bad things: for example the original e-mail protocol (SMTP) allowed anybody to connect to a an e-mail server using Telnet (a plain text, unencrypted remote comms terminal) and type a bunch of pretty si mple commands to send an e-mail as if they were any e-mail account on that domain (which was a great way for techies to prank their mates back when I was at Uni in the early 90s) and even now that a lot of it got tightenned we’re still suffering from problems like spam and phishing due to the “good faith” approach for designing what became one of the most used text communication protocol around.

Create a post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


  • 1 user online
  • 175 users / day
  • 576 users / week
  • 1.37K users / month
  • 4.48K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 7.41K Posts
  • 84.7K Comments
  • Modlog