“Yeah, they’re gone”: Musk confirms cuts to X’s election integrity team
arstechnica.com
external-link
"'Election Integrity' Team... was undermining election integrity," Musk writes.

“Yeah, they’re gone”: Musk confirms cuts to X’s election integrity team — “‘Election Integrity’ Team… was undermining election integrity,” Musk writes::“‘Election Integrity’ Team… was undermining election integrity,” Musk writes.

removed by mod

Tbf they’re a social media company. If they shut down completely the world wouldn’t really skip a beat.

This guy 👈 [sing-song]

@avater@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
10
edit-2
1Y

removed by mod

@bemenaker@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
161Y

When will the Tesla board of directors move against Musk as CEO to save the company?

I just bought a new electric car. Didn’t even consider Tesla because of this guy.

I’m about 75% certain this guy has no idea which words are coming out of his mouth.

Funny that the worse the Republicans are doing the more some people want to take the filters off of social media.

@A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
43
edit-2
1Y

Right Wingers have always gotten preferential treatment and soft touch moderation on social media, because…

  1. Their user base is fucking morons who click every ad, and buy tons of stupid shit (specially if it has their team name on it) bringing in disproportionate income

  2. They know the bulk of their moderation problems are from Right wingers, and don’t want to look biased and drive them away by holding them to the same standard they hold everyone else, So they just let the right wingers get away with shit that would get cracked down and account bans handed out for anyone else.

  3. Their own algorithms have been proven to amplify right wing tweets, thus making it easier to find hate messages than it is to find anything else, because they are in bed with the right.

@fubo@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
4
edit-2
1Y

The commercial platforms had a dilemma: (1) They had existing policies against hate propaganda, incitement of violence, and harassment. (2) They wanted to seem at least mostly neutral on matters of partisan politics. And then (3) happened: one of the major parties started doing a lot of hate propaganda, incitement of violence, and harassment.

If Facebook, Twitter, etc. had been following their own stated policies, they would have taken down Trump much earlier. However, those policies were never obligations enforceable against the platform, and would have required those platform companies to explicitly state that they were taking down one of the major parties for not following the platform’s rules on hate, violence, and harassment.

Eventually, advertisers communicated with their dollars, that they were not seeing a benefit to their brands from having their ads appear beside the increasingly deranged, criminal, and traitorous Trump.

Maybe that was the plan all along.

  1. Turn Twitter into a turd soup

  2. Educated people who don’t click ads stop using Twitter

  3. Save unproductive bandwidth

By quitting twitter I’ve gone along with Musk’s plan. Damn it.

Musk isnt that smart.

Besides, a lot of those big advertisers don’t mind advertising to racists/fashies/terrorists, as long as they have the plausible deniability of “Oh, we advertise on twitter, it has a vibrant user base, lets not let the unsavory types ruin it for everyone”.

A deniability that goes away now that its been bought by a fashy white supremacist who is actively purging the site of anyone critical to fashy white supremacism.

No one but scummy companies like MyPillow and some asshole selling “gold” trump coins (totally legal tender!*) want to advertise to the creme of that crop.

⁽*ᶜᵒᶦⁿˢ ʰᵃᵛᵉ ⁿᵒ ˡᵉᵍᵃˡ ᵗᵉⁿᵈᵉʳ ᵃⁿᵈ ᵃʳᵉ ᶦⁿᵗᵉⁿᵈᵉᵈ ᶠᵒʳ ᶜᵒˡˡᵉᶜᵗᶦᵒⁿ ᵒⁿˡʸ⁾

I’m gratified that you thought my dumb idea was smart…

@cyd@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
81Y

How much do you think Linda Yaccarino is enjoying her job as CEO?

Donno, I ignore her salary.

Forgot she even existed.

@cyd@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
81Y

So did Elon ;-)

@Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
103
edit-2
1Y

I have a hunch that in the terrifyingly near future, we’re going to see the internet absolutely dominated by enshitification.

Don’t get me wrong, it’s bad now …because like the frogs in hot water, we collectively just tolerate changes for the worse. But it used to be small incremental changes over a long period.

Then this Musk asshole comes along, looks at the frogs ever so slowly cooking… and cranks the stove to max, pisses in the frog-pot, supplements the heating element with a welding torch, and flips the frogs off as he pours gasoline all over the kitchen.

And the frogs JUST FUCKING TAKE IT.

What message does that send to the rest of the internet?

Don’t panic until it smells like butter and garlic?

@CeeBee@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
531Y

Here’s a bit of good news. The idea that frogs just wait to get boiled is proven false. Every animal has a limit to what they will tolerate due to self preservation. The from will jump out when it gets too hot.

That being said, I just recently watched Idiocracy… I’m a bit worried.

@tabular@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
21Y

removed by mod

I’ve been reading more books.

vasametropolis
link
fedilink
English
31Y

It has been predicted for years that the Internet would split and I’m all for it at this point.

conservative doesn’t like being treated like an equal, decides to abolish the group that produced evidence suggesting equality

Sounds about right

@mlg@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
-11Y

Man I’d pay money for him to do the same thing to the totally democratic election commission of Pakistan.

But that would involve getting rid of a useless thing which I don’t think Musk is physically capable of doing lol

Aside from conservatives, what fascist dipshits still use Twitter? It’s just a cesspool of disinformation and bigotry, so I just assume anyone who uses it is a lying bigot.

@InvaderDJ@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
41Y

Unfortunately, there are still functions that Twitter serves that nothing else does. For breaking news, it’s still unmatched. For celebrities, influencers, politicians, journalists, etc there’s no other platform that has the same microblogging function with the user numbers and clout that Twitter does.

Until that changes, its still useful. It gets less and less useful, but as long as the site is up, allows users to post up to the minute updates and allows users to follow posters, there’s only so far it can fall without real competition.

kamenLady.
link
fedilink
English
2
edit-2
1Y

Iirc Amber Alerts ( not the ones notifying Amber Heard’s coming to town ) are issued over Twitter. There were cases of people not being able to check, because now a login is required?

I never used Twitter. Here in Germany it has never gotten so far, that it would be the only place you would get some of the important government announcements that can save lives.

Edit: no hate for Amber Heard from my side. I liked to play this stupid joke in my head, long before The Shitshow happened.

@SMT42@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
21Y

Seriously though,what has really changed? It’s always been a cesspool

Maxnmy's
link
fedilink
English
51Y

I have run out of surprised reactions to his bullshit.

Create a post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


  • 1 user online
  • 191 users / day
  • 586 users / week
  • 1.37K users / month
  • 4.49K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 7.41K Posts
  • 84.7K Comments
  • Modlog