👉 https://www.blizzard.com/en-us/legal/fba4d00f-c7e4-4883-b8b9-1b4500a402ea/blizzard-end-user-license-agreementhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AddtrV6UFFsht...
@Raxiel@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
17M

I haven’t watched Louis’ video, but I do have a Blizzard account, and up until a couple of days ago I had an active WoW subscription (ended because I wanted to play other games, not to make a point).

I didn’t get presented with any new terms recently, presumably I will in the future should I decide to sign up again, or even dip in on a free trial account.

I did look up the terms though. I’m not in the US so it’s not clear if I’d be bound by it anyway but not only do they have an opt-out clause (11.A.vi) they’re actually less egregious than some EULAs, allowing opt-out via email, rather than requiring a mailed in letter (Roku) and being prominently highlighted at the top.

Lot of folks here dreaming about them going bankrupt, I have to say, I think that’s wishful thinking. The current WoW expansion has been very successful with the highest signups and retention in a long time as they’ve apparently figured out what players actually want. Even without their other IP’s they’re doing ok.

Don’t buy games from such vultures

Cosmic Cleric
link
fedilink
English
67M

Let your House of Representative member know that you do not want forced arbitration.

First Roku did a quick force TOS change before a beach disclosure, now Blizzard is mysteriously forcing a change to their TOS. I have no idea what’s coming next. Seems like it’s going to become part of the breach playbook to minimize financial loss. Maybe there will be a law against it in… oh…15 years?

@ripcord@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
27M

Roku wasn’t breached. They reported that a bunch of people who had reused passwords from other breached sites were compromised.

So you have all users sign a new TOS to force a password change? I’m not seeing the connection.

@ripcord@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
17M

The TOS had nothing to do with having announced that some peoples’ accounts had been compromised due to password reuse from other hacked sites. People just started conspiracy theoryin’

@Plopp@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
57M

Roku bought a beach?

@aeronmelon@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
27M

In Arizona.

I should buy some oceanfront property there.

@atrielienz@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
27M

Is the beach the place where the breach happened?

@STOMPYI@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
317M

So i’m not a lawyer but isn’t there a law for unconsciability, When a contract is so one-sided, it’s obvious that me the signer has absolutely no rights.The entire contract is voided.

@Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
28
edit-2
7M

EULAs and TOSes are as legally binding as a secondhand piece of toiletpaper with a contract written in shit. Almost every single one will be thrown out in court. The problem is getting to that point in the first place, and incurring the (time, effort & money) costs while enduring. Most common people can’t afford that, which the companies know, so they keep making unenforceable EULAs.

“Maybe if Activision gets bought by Microsoft, Blizzard won’t be as scummy.”

Hahaha, nope.

Between the company rape culture and enabling internet & gambling addiction, Blizzard is dead to me.

Support your local private servers.

@flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
17
edit-2
7M

I understand why Louis likes privacy.com so much. But he really needs to stop telling people to use them as a means of stopping payment with scummy vendors and companies so frivolously without having a disclaimer that it can open that person up to getting their credit dinged for non-payment.

Maybe he doesn’t care about such things, but his viewers might.

To get around the Blizzard dark pattern the “right way”, agree to the EULA, login, cancel subscriptions, remove payment details, close account (if possible), stop using Battle.net, done. Now the EULA is irrelevant. This also has the knock on effect of being the path that Blizzard/Activision/MS will actually notice since it will cost them money at scale in a way they can’t explain away as childish internet trolling.

Edit: a word (irreverent > irrelevant)

@samus12345@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
27M

Now the EULA is irreverent.

True, but I think you meant “irrelevant”.

Indeed I did sir/madam

I support this. Sadly I’m not subscribed but wish I was just so I could cancel 🥲

Well you don’t own the games and they are just games

@kwebb990@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
37M

hopefully a class action lawsuit in the making. i wouldnt think doing this would hold up in court would it? INAL tho

@reksas@sopuli.xyz
link
fedilink
English
137M

How can they “force” anything if you dont sign? By not agreeing to new terms… you dont agree to the terms. Wouldnt having it any other way just be insanity? Like i could write “contract” here that by viewing it you agree to it and if you dont agree, i could still claim that some part of it applies because it reads so in the contract. Or I have some other contract that is agreeable and someone signs it, then I change the terms and other party can’t reject them all because of something in the first contract.

Cosmic Cleric
link
fedilink
English
17M

deleted by creator

@splonglo@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
127M

Worthless company. Hope they go bankrupt.

They’re not worthless, I would love to take ownership and sell it for a pretty penny

OMG, Blizzard?! How could they?!? -.-

bruhSoulz
link
fedilink
English
137M

I have less reasons to feel bad about pirating everything day by day

Create a post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


  • 1 user online
  • 182 users / day
  • 580 users / week
  • 1.37K users / month
  • 4.49K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 7.41K Posts
  • 84.7K Comments
  • Modlog