Apple has suspended work on the second-generation Vision Pro headset to singularly focus on a cheaper model, The Information reports. Apple was...
Jesus
link
fedilink
English
344M

Apple has suspended work on the second-generation Vision Pro headset to singularly focus on a cheaper model

That seems very reasonable and like what they probably should’ve been doing all along.

@555@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
14M

The front screen is what no one wants in a cheaper version. Don’t cut back on sound and cameras ffs

@riodoro1@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
204M

Bro, just one more year. Let them come up with just another pair of goggles bro, trust me bro, one more year and we will be in VR future bro.

Quest 3 adoption is super high compared to where quest 1 or 2 were at years ago, the apple vision pro wasn’t meant to create mass adoption anyway, not at that price point.

@Snapz@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
54M

BUT THE SHAREHOLDERS!!!

@kevincox@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
84M

I don’t know why everyone is so negative. The gameplan seems pretty clear to me.

  1. Make expensive fancy product. This is effectively a “devkit” that companies can use to start experimenting with AR software.
  2. Make lower cost product. There are now a few decent apps available and early adopters will be willing to buy it to be one the leading edge.
  3. Now there is a bigger market, leading more companies to be willing to develop apps.

Apple is hoping that this is enough to break the chicken-and-egg cycle. Enough to get a few powerful apps such that more regular consumers will be willing to buy which again increases the addressable market which makes it more attractive to companies.

@TrickDacy@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
34M

Yep that’s exactly why they had started the 2 then changed their mind lol. Alllll part of the plan

@dustyData@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
34M

It’s all 5D chess, just like Elon.

@Cossty@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
54M

The only thing I could see myself using it for, is being in bed and watching a movie. I can do that with ar glasses for 300$.

dinckel
link
fedilink
English
34M

The price immediately put this product into the grave. They should take out all the useless features like the eye passthrough, or the bizarre face scanning, if it’ll only ever be used for calls. If this were to be used in a gaming scenario, sort of like what the PSVR2 does, that’d be a whole different conversation

@danc4498@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
174M

Is this the virtual boy of Apple? A product that never really made no sense to anybody and was never really supported?

@just_another_person@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
3
edit-2
4M

At least the VirtualBoy sold enough to not make it a waste of time?

@ripcord@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
24M

It did?

@TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
3
edit-2
4M

No.

At 770,000 sold, it is Nintendo’s lowest-selling standalone console and the only one to have less than one million units sold, seconded by the Wii U’s 13.6 million units.

The Wii U was seen as a complete and utter sales flop. The Wii U outsold the VirtualBoy 18:1.

@nutsack@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
24M

it was cool though

@barsquid@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
54M

I was hoping they’d get the price down to something sane. It looks like it could be a cool tool for CAD. Of course there won’t be any input available from a non-Apple computer so I still wouldn’t want one.

@danc4498@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
44M

I desperately want a virtual desktop environment for plain ass computing. Give me infinite windows for my spreadsheet and IDE and that’s all I need!

@nutsack@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
34M

you can do this with the quest 3 i think

@barsquid@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
34M

Without a Meta account tho? I’ve got hard blockers on price or shenanigans (or both) for every headset I know of.

@danc4498@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
44M

I’ve heard the quest 3 is awesome and does almost everything the Vision does. Not sure I can justify the price to myself yet.

@nutsack@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
24M

i am using a quest 2 for productivity and ebooks but the resolution is so low that my desktops need to be 1280x720 or I can’t read them. it will be nice to upgrade when i get the chance.

@danc4498@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
24M

I’ve heard the resolution is good enough to watch movies on too. Not sure if that is true, but that would be a selling point for me.

@nutsack@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
14M

oh yea, watching movies is incredible. that’s the other thing im using it for

@sudo42@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
144M

Why does this feel like another “voice assistant” that we’re supposed to talk to all day?

If we worked from home, maaaayyybe voice control could be a thing once it’s 100%? But Boss Man wants us back at work. Are we really going to be a open-office with everyone talking to their computer like some sort of crypto bro boiler room?

It’s sorta like the “video phone” that everyone was dying to have for decades. We finally got it and everyone went “meh”. A few grandparents use it to talk to their grandkids. Hell, most of the current generations don’t even use phones anymore.

It’s one more technology that’s being pushed out before it’s baked and will likely be only really useful in niche applications. Really fucking good for those niche applications, but just too expensive and awkward for anyone else.

The video phone is now facetime, skype, zoom, google meet etc…

@sudo42@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
44M

Yeah, FaceTime. But how often do people use it in practice?

Good point about Zoom. Business clearly like Zoom for meetings, but big business is still hammering BTO hard. Will Zoom be marginalized when they finally force in-person meetings?

Also, the last few companies I worked for that did Zoom meetings, everyone kept their cameras off.

It’s not every day for everyone, but I used video calling every day to talk to my foreign spouse, and to talk to my little brothers when I was overseas. It’s pretty amazing overall.

@SpeedLimit55@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
2
edit-2
4M

My kid and his friends use FaceTime instead of calling and will often be on it for hours while gaming. It’s much easier than a call for 3+ people. We are in the US but I imagine they use whatsapp or whatever the same way other places.

I work for a smaller org (less than 50 ppl) and we are generally required to have cameras on in meetings.

@TORFdot0@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
14M

If they can’t get the headset to fit the size and weight of swimming goggles, I don’t think it can get mass adoption

@M500@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
194M

Companies have been pushing VR so long now. I’ll say that I think the tech is cool and the idea is cool, but I will literally never use them.

I can’t wear them while working as I am in meetings 99% of the time.

I would not wear them in my free time, as I do not want to disassociate from my wife and cats.

@dev_null@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
7
edit-2
4M

I love VR. So I use it for gaming maybe once a week, for 1-2 hours, usually as an activity with my SO so we can switch who’s playing each “round” depending on the game. That’s the maximum I find fun instead of tiring. I can’t see using it for long periods or for work, that sounds like a nightmare.

@kureta@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
24M

I would only use VR in racing, flight sim, or space sim games. probably once a couple of months after the initial excitement.

@M500@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
14M

That’s a good point. I’d have loved this for elite dangerous.

It’s absolutely phenomenal for gaming or vr “experiences” (basically movies made specifically for vr). But the corpos are really hellbent on making everyone use it for meetings for some fucking reason. Which is truly the lamest, most unnecessary use of this tech.

@Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
04M

The current iterations have far more potential than the past.

But the hardware is stil too power inefficiënt and the display pixel density is expensive to produce.

@jj4211@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
24M

I have found my headset useful for work, when working from home and I don’t do camera on meetings anyway.

At home it’s pretty nice, and since my ears are open I can actually talk, so my wife actually prefers it over me wearing headphones. But all things in moderation, I wouldn’t wear it constantly.

Despite being a huge fan of the concept, I still couldn’t go for Apple’s headset, it’s heavy, it’s expensive, and lack of controllers are all deal breakers. The Quest 3 is lighter, has good controllers, and is more affordable. It may not have the displays as nice as Vision, but that doesn’t make up for the rest of the stuff.

@daddy32@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
24M

Aren’t the meetings pushed as one of the basic function of these? But I guess it only makes sense if most of the participants use them and software has the support.

@M500@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
14M

If most people have them? Ok, I’ll tell all my clients to get a pair 😂

@Buffalox@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
114M

Apple should make a virtual headset you can buy in META, then put it on when you are already in a VR setting, except now you can use Apple services with it!

That way it would have zero production cost, be absolutely as useless as it already is, and can be just as overpriced.

It seems like the perfect Apple scheme.

If you can continue with vapid schemes that ensure endless shareholder value I’ll follow you anywhere senpaisano

@DarkCloud@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
7
edit-2
4M

I’m not sure why they tried this.

‘We made a VR games headset, but replaced the games with office related programs, like calenders and notepads’

Did any of them ever use an Oculus Quest? Like, why did they try this? Is this Apple’s Google Glass moment? Did they really think that if you pay enough youtubers to wear it in public, normal people would magically go into car-level debt to emulate them?

In fact, I’ll go as far as to say this campaign and price point was a bigger mistake, and a louder failure than Google Glasses.

atocci
link
fedilink
English
34M

I don’t know how far things have come since the aptly named Acer AH101-D8EY, but that was the last time I tried to be “productive” in VR and it was absolutely not working.

I made the right choice back in 2019 when they were recruiting optimechanics experts. It’s a dumb idea.

qevlarr
link
fedilink
English
14M

Good for sticking to something you believe in. Highly underrated quality in engineers. “Take the money and run like a thief” is such a bullshit attitude

Yeah the best jobs are all about doing something you like. The moment you stop caring much about being employed there, quality drops and your own reputation is on the line. It’s much better to do what you love. Getting paid 🤪 for it, that’s my wife’s job. She pushed me in the negotiation phase to the point where I was so uncomfortable. But now I feel like that was ok based on the change I brought to others in the company. My pay bump raised the pay for several others. But anyway, do what you love and get paid doing it, like Chris Rock said once…or twice while getting paid to say it.

Create a post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


  • 1 user online
  • 175 users / day
  • 576 users / week
  • 1.37K users / month
  • 4.48K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 7.41K Posts
  • 84.7K Comments
  • Modlog